case legislation Case legislation is legislation that is based on judicial decisions fairly than regulation based on constitutions , statutes , or regulations . Case law concerns distinctive disputes resolved by courts using the concrete facts of the case. By contrast, statutes and regulations are written abstractly. Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common legislation , refers back to the collection of precedents and authority established by previous judicial decisions on the particular issue or matter.
Some pluralist systems, like Scots regulation in Scotland and types of civil legislation jurisdictions in Quebec and Louisiana, don't exactly healthy into the dual common-civil law system classifications. These types of systems may perhaps have been intensely influenced because of the Anglo-American common law tradition; however, their substantive legislation is firmly rooted while in the civil law tradition.
14. During the light of your position explained over, it is concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be considered for no fault of his own and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency in the size of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Unfortunately, that wasn't accurate. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son instructed his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to possessing sexually molested the couple’s son several times.
Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be made and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year old boy from his home to protect him from the Terrible physical and sexual abuse he had endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children inside the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted all over within the foster care system.
The legislation as founded in previous court rulings; like common law, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be nicely-settled that even though taking into consideration the case of regular promotion of civil servants, the competent authority should evaluate the merit of many of the qualified candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to these eligible candidates who will be found to get most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was ignored because of the respondent department just to extend favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy about the part on the respondent department.
Matter:-PROTECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 114/2025 check here (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-251830 Tag:Additionally, the main objectives of the police is always to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and previously mentioned all, guarantee legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The law enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other Courts, Nevertheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The presence of this power casts an obligation on the police, and so they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its various pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are needed to protect and not abduct. Read more
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common legislation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale powering their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
Previous 4 tax years interpreted. It's not necessarily from the date of finalisation of audit but from the tax year involved. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a well-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings over the evidence.